Re: gb_t and memMeter

From: Robert Collins <robert.collins@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 07:49:09 +1000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Rousskov" <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
Cc: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: gb_t and memMeter

> On Tue, 1 May 2001, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > configure.in has code to define int64_t if any 64 bit int is
available.
> > we should use int64_t and expand that code if system types are
missing
> > on some platforms.
>
> What would you "expand" into if a platform has no 64bit integral types
> though? A missing struct is easy to replace, but it is not true for a
> missing internal type (in C).
>
> As far as I can see, you would have to make the possibly-missing
> internal type opaque (void*) and handle it via gb_t-like interfaces
> only. I may be missing a better solution though.

Hmm. I think the phrase is "Coffee". Thats what I was missing when I
replied.

Rob

> Alex.
>
>
Received on Mon Apr 30 2001 - 15:52:04 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:51 MST