On Tue, 1 May 2001, Robert Collins wrote:
> configure.in has code to define int64_t if any 64 bit int is available.
> we should use int64_t and expand that code if system types are missing
> on some platforms.
What would you "expand" into if a platform has no 64bit integral types
though? A missing struct is easy to replace, but it is not true for a
missing internal type (in C).
As far as I can see, you would have to make the possibly-missing
internal type opaque (void*) and handle it via gb_t-like interfaces
only. I may be missing a better solution though.
Alex.
Received on Mon Apr 30 2001 - 15:51:18 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:51 MST