On Saturday 23 August 2014 at 17:55:26 (EU time), babajaga wrote:
> In the past, with older squids, there was a bug regarding a conflict with
> the general parm maximum_object_size
>
> regarding the sequence (may be: value ?) of cache_dir max-size and
> max_obj_size.
No, it was the sequence they appeared in the config file.
> Can't exactly remember, think, max_obj_ has to be before cache_dir in
> squid.conf, imposing the highest limit.
> Should not contradict cache_dir max-size.
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/201404/0159.html
So, just to be on the safe side (I don't know in which Squid version this bug
was fixed), if you have a maximum_object_size parameter in your configuration
file, make sure it occurs before the definition of your cache_dir definitions.
Antony.
-- BASIC is to computer languages what Roman numerals are to arithmetic. Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me.Received on Sat Aug 23 2014 - 16:09:14 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 24 2014 - 12:00:06 MDT