[squid-users] Re: WARNING: Could not determine this machines public hostname. Please configure one or set 'visible_hostname'.

Alex Rousskov wrote
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale#Will_similar_workers_receive_similar_amount_of_work.3F
>
> (but that is not the only theory in existence and YMMV).
>
> HTH,
>
> Alex.

hi alex , thanks alot for reply ,

actually it was miss config , i was supposed to put visible hostname for
other processes of squid !

again ,
relative to core/worker distribution ,

actually i visited
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale#Will_similar_workers_receive_similar_amount_of_work.3F
more and more , abut not understanding it 100 %

i didnt find clear answer of " will similar workers have similar cpu ?? " ,
but as i understood , that developers made a patch tat optimize the cpu
distribution ,

but also with result you put , there were clear difference of workers cores
utiliztion

does from you result , mean that we cant have full load core distribution ?

regards

-----
Dr.x

--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/WARNING-Could-not-determine-this-machines-public-hostname-Please-configure-one-or-set-visible-hostna-tp4663074p4663099.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.