Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7.x No Transparent Smartphones issues with youtube?

Hi Ben.
  I have been using pfsense for more than 4 years without issue, I
understand and accept your opinion.
  I have running squid with pfsense and centos to, love it.
  U point something interes about some advanced GUI to edit squid
under pfsense, I'm with u, this is complex because but not impossible,
squid have so much features that we I used I think 20% of features, is
a huge program.
  But in my case, I edit squid under pfsense manually this way I have
a better control on what I'm doing, I just the GUI to setup the basic
settings and them boom, manually.
  Now returning to the problem, what can cause my smartphone to not
display youtube video, but let me browse and search?
  Thanks Ben.

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Ben Nichols
<webmaster_at_squidblacklist.org> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Beto Moreno" <pamrtj_at_gmail.com>
> To: <squid-users_at_squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 4:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7.x No Transparent Smartphones issues
> with youtube?
>
>
>
>> This is a test enviroment under pfsense, is all.
>> I have the option to move to squid 3.x I can.
>> Now related to smartphone, 3.x fix this came of issues?
>>
>>
>
> Running Squid under pfsense?
>
> Pardon me if someone finds what I am about to say offensive,
>
> But in my opinion, pfsense is a childs toy, and no sane man would put it
> into production in a serious environment,
>
> More specifically, in regards to squid proxy, I find that it is absurd the
> way they bury the squid.conf in some obscure
> xml scheme, as I have placed multiple inquiries to the pfsense community
> over this issue, the response I got...
>
> Was essentially that they are purposely making direct editing of
> configuration file difficult to do for the end users.
>
> I was offended by this, as I find their user interface for squid3 lacking in
> configuration directives, limiting the users ability
> to truly have the freedom to configure the squid proxy under pfsense in any
> sensible manner.
>
> But then again, that is just my opinion, and maybe I am wrong, but thats how
> I see it.
>
> Hopefully some serious squid enthusiasts/experts can assist the pfsense
> developerment team in developing a better interface for squid proxy under
> pfsense, or even simply allow an option in the pfsense web gui for direct
> editing of the configuration file for advanced or custom tailored options.
>
>
>
> Once again, I apologize if voicing my opinion on this matter if it was less
> than productive.
>
> Fix Nichols
> http://www.squidblacklist.org
Received on Sat Jun 29 2013 - 00:03:51 MDT