Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.2, multiple workers, SNMP (and a bit of IPv6)

Hi.

On 18.01.2013 06:42, Panagiotis Christias wrote:

> In both cases, every SNMP adds two or new stale entries (filedescriptors,
> sockets or whatever) as reported by lsof:
>
> # lsof -i -nP | egrep 'PID|:163$'
> COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
> squid 5007 squid 15u IPv4 0xfffffe0006b14790 0t0 UDP 127.0.0.1:163
> squid 5008 squid 15u IPv4 0xfffffe0006b14790 0t0 UDP 127.0.0.1:163
> squid 5008 squid 19u IPv4 0xfffffe0006b14790 0t0 UDP 127.0.0.1:163
> squid 5008 squid 41u IPv4 0xfffffe0006b14790 0t0 UDP 127.0.0.1:163
> (and the list gets longer and longer as our monitoring systems keep
> quering squid..).
>
> Everything (SNMP-related) works correctly when we use just one worker
> but currently this is no option since a single squid 3.2 worker seems
> to be unable to handle as many requests as squid 2.7 (in our case at
> least).
>
> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
>
Yeah, recently I discovered that I have exactly same issue with 3.2.9.
Furthermore, I can say that I even have more workers than intended:

22972 ?? S 0:02.92 (squid-2) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf
(squid)
23146 ?? S 0:02.44 (squid-1) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf
(squid)
23237 ?? S 0:00.74 (squid-coord-3) -f
/usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf (squid)
31139 ?? R 0:00.11 (squid-1) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf
(squid)
31192 ?? R 0:00.01 (squid-1) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf
(squid)
31193 ?? R 0:00.00 (squid-1) -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf
(squid)

Some of they don't die after squid -k kill, I have to kill them
explicitely with -9.
Is that normal ? Right now I decided to switch back to non-SMP.
And yeah, I just don't like this situation with thousands of open FDs,
wich doesn't happen with one worker.

Is this resolved in 3.3.x ?

Thanks.
Eugene.
Received on Tue Apr 02 2013 - 05:38:12 MDT