[squid-users] Re: which kernel is best for squid 3.xx with centos 6.3 with youtube caching ?

babajaga wrote
> 25% ... is that byte-hitrate ?
> If YES: not very impressive.
>
> I have self-made cache, especially for youtube. And between 30%-35%
> byte-hitrate, daily, with about 20GB/day traffic, incl. cached data.
> However, 4TB disk space in use.
>
>>2- the performance of video cache is bad , it just make about 5 M at max .
<
>
> What does this mean ?

hi babajaga , thanks for reply ,
but im sorry to ask you wt do u mean with "byte-hitrate " ???
agian ,
my question is about kernel , does new kernel may make problems with 3rd
parties like videocache ???
im using kernel 3.7.5
the original kernel of centos 6.3 is 3.2.x as i remember , i mean i had to
rebuild it with "tproxy" supporting .
i said that with the config of squid , i can save about 25 % of bw and
squidguard is excellent .
=======================================================================
about the bad performance of videocache , i mean because most of
connections is "timewait " not "established" the performance of youtube is
bad , and it seems as im not using videocache , i monitored the cache of
videocache it just make 5 M - 10 M as maximum !!!!!

i mean that im only caching 25 % whatever in the absence of videocache or in
the presence of videocache .

regards

--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/which-kernel-is-best-for-squid-3-xx-with-centos-6-3-with-youtube-caching-tp4658999p4659007.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.