See, I'm configuring my squid.conf intending it to run in mesh:
cache_peer 192.168.15.200 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
cache_peer 192.168.15.201 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
cache_peer 192.168.15.202 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
cache_peer 192.168.15.203 parent 3128 0 no-query round robin
My scenario is that there are four nodes, a front-end and the other
nodes. As it is configured, when sent to the node IP , he accumulates
more bytes than the other three nodes. I wonder whether we can make an
ideal balancing ? If yes, how to do it?
Thanks!
Igor Rafael da Rocha
2011/4/30 Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
> On 30/04/11 23:43, igor rocha wrote:
>>
>> Hello everybody,
>> wonder if someone me would one model implementation squid.conf that
>> really works with mesh've worked with one configuration from own Squid
>> documentation but' there one hierarchy occultly happening because
>> directs first for he,one cache particularly of the cluster and always
>> fills first this cache someone have some hint ?
>> Thanks
>
> Please outline what you what you are trying to achieve. There are several
> very different models called "mesh" and Squid does all of them.
>
> Amos
> --
> Please be using
> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12
> Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.7 and 3.1.12.1
>
Received on Mon May 02 2011 - 21:08:00 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 05 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT