Re: Res: [squid-users] squid 3.2.0.5 smp scaling issues

On 04/25/2011 06:14 PM, david_at_lang.hm wrote:
>>> if that regains the speed and/or scalability it would point fingers
>>> fairly conclusively at the DNS components.
>>>
>>> this is the only think that I can think of that should be shared between
>>> multiple workers processing ACLs
>>
>> but it is _not_ currently shared from Squid point of view.
>
> Ok, I was assuming from the description of things that there would be
> one DNS process that all the workers would be accessing. from the way
> it's described in the documentation it sounds as if it's already a
> separate process

I would like to fix that documentation, but I cannot find what phrase
led you to the above conclusion. The SmpScale wiki page says:

> Currently, Squid workers do not share and do not synchronize other
> resources or services, including:
>
> * DNS caches (ipcache and fqdncache);

So that seems to be correct and clear. Which documentation are you
referring to?

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Tue Apr 26 2011 - 04:19:01 MDT