Re: [squid-users] building 3.1.12

 On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:02:27 +0800, cc wrote:
> Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:45:00 +0800, cc wrote:
>>> Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> struct icmphdr
>>> {
>>> u_int8_t type; /* message type */
>>> u_int8_t code; /* type sub-code */
>>> u_int16_t checksum;
>>> union
>>> {
>>> struct
>>> {
>>> u_int16_t id;
>>> u_int16_t sequence;
>>> } echo; /* echo datagram */
>>> u_int32_t gateway; /* gateway address */
>>> struct
>>> {
>>> u_int16_t __unused;
>>> u_int16_t mtu;
>>> } frag; /* path mtu discovery */
>>> } un;
>>> };
>>
>> WTF? "incomplete type" really. GCC 3.3 must have been screwed. I was
>> expecting to see frag or echo as just a stub name we would have to
>> locate elsewhere.
>
> Hi Amos,
>
> Thanks for the quick response. what exactly is the
> struct supposed to look like? or better yet, where
> might I find the correct one?

 That appears to be the correct one as far as I can see. GCC 3.3 was
 complaining about something which apparently does not exist -> screwed.

>
> (Anyone in Slackware land that knows of where these
> headers are found? i.e. which package?)

 kernel-headers or such.

 Amos
Received on Wed Apr 20 2011 - 03:52:39 MDT