On 06/04/11 21:04, Jenny Lee wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:26:09 +0800, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin wrote:
>>> how about the dev branch? i found the tarball of 6th version of
>>> 3.2.0.x,any information?
>>
>> The bundles were made, however we have already found a few nasty
>> problems.
>> I'm giving it a few more days to see how much can be fixed.
>>
>> Amos
>>
>
> Shall we expect a 3.2.0.7 or shall we start using 3.2.0.6 or 3.2.HEAD?
>
> 3.2.0.6 fixes few issues that were plaguing us since 6 months. However, due to issues encountered, we are afraid to put it to production use (i know what it is but we use 3.2.0.2 in production now since the features we want is not available on stable versions).
>
> Jenny
Sorry for not answering. There was just had nothing I could be sure
about until now...
3.2.0.7 will be out early (and very soon) with fixes for the critical
and blocker bugs currently known to exist in 3.2.0.6 tarballs. The fixes
are now in 3.HEAD awaiting some maintenance and any testing you care to
throw at them.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.6Received on Sun Apr 17 2011 - 13:34:33 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 17 2011 - 12:00:03 MDT