On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:33:37 +0200, Adrian Dascalu
<adrian.dascalu_at_eea.europa.eu> wrote:
> Done some new tests and I found out that caching an URL that has a
> different X-Username header will invalidate the other version of that
> object.
Aha, you can disregard my earlier reply.
>
> Is this the intended behaviour?
Yes.
> I mean, Vary header will just inform
> there is a new version so everything else is discarded?
No, vary header informs Squid whether the cached object may be served or a
second fetched. The headers of the new reply informs whether to invalidate
the old copy.
> If so, is there
> a method for cacheing multiple versions of the same URL ?
Unique ETag headers are required for that.
Amos
Received on Tue Nov 09 2010 - 02:36:01 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 09 2010 - 12:00:02 MST