Re: [squid-users] how much traffic can squid handle?

From: Drunkard Zhang <gongfan193_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:32:30 +0800

2010/8/12 Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_fantomas.sk>:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Drunkard Zhang <gongfan193_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > With same multi-squid-instance configuration, same Linux distro, and
>> > different hardware, AMD Opteron gets more balanced CPU usage, while on
>> > Intel Xeon just one CPU core running out, others still too idle, about
>> > 5%-15%. When that core runs out, simple TCP SYN check on service
>> > failed occasional.
>> >
>> > I'm still trying to get this problem resolved...:-( Now I'm trying
>> > linux-2.6.35 kernel :-).
>
> On 11.08.10 19:24, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>> So, the only logical conclusion is: AMD rules! :)
>
> Actually, since there's "different hardware", I can even thing of APIC
> problems on the intel machine...
>

I‘m trying new kernel 2.6.35 since yesterday, it looks like CPU usage
balanced better.
Has anyone did the same thing? Or it's just my illusion of loving linux, :-(

I read this: http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Linux-2635-and-early-days-of-Linux/

>> (I actually like
>> AMD, but I have never faced this kind of problem with Xeon, or maybe
>> I'm just not paying attention, will make a few test myself, and see
>> how it ends).

I like AMD too, but the hardware is way hard to obtain to Intel in
China... Tragic!
Received on Thu Aug 12 2010 - 10:33:02 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 12 2010 - 12:00:03 MDT