Re: [squid-users] Advice regarding Squid Vs "regular" Apache

2010/5/16 Reverse Squid <reversesquid_at_gmail.com>:

> Perhaps I will get better caching results simply with an apache. That
> way there is no IMS, no overhead. That's it.
>
> What do you think?

Hi,

A simple case, each squid box I maintained the concurrent connections
could be around 30000.
But for Apache you can't get that number of connections at the same time.

For small objects Squid is faster and more effective than Apache.
But for large files like videos you may consider other solution, for
example, lighttpd for serving them.

-- 
Tech support agency in China
http://duxieweb.com/