Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

> > > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > > >I'm running squid in this setup:
> > > >
> > > >client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs
> > > >
> > > >When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100
> > > >dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm
> > > >seeing a constant 252 dansguardian processes (the maximum).
> > > >
> > > >Is squid-3.1 somehow "keeping connections open" to it's parent?

> > * Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
> > > Looks that way. The defaults for persistent connections have not
> > > changed between 2.x and 3.x though AFAIK.

> mån 2009-10-12 klockan 16:48 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > Hm. So did 2.7.x use persisten connections?

On 13.10.09 01:12, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Yes.
>
> But bug #2451 made it drop the upstream connections a bit too often...
> fixed in 2.7.STABLE7.

so the problem was not "3.1 uses too many connections" but "2.7 drops
connections when it should not".
A bit funny ;)

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
WinError #99999: Out of error messages.