Re: [squid-users] recommended memory/cache replacement policy

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_fantomas.sk>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:50:56 +0200

> > Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
> > > squid cache 2.7 STABLE5
> > > squid cahce 3.0 STABLE19
> > >
> > > I am using the following memory/cache replacement policy
> > >
> > > memory_replacement_policy heap LFUDA
> > > cache_replacement_policy heap LFUDA
> > >
> > > are they(heap LFUDA) best or most recommended ? or should I left them
> > > default.

> Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 06:22:34, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
> > The defaults there were last tuned years ago and is not heap at all.
> > Read the descriptions of each carefully, the ones I saw a while back
> > covered several scenarios of traffic patterns and sizes and how the
> > policies worked in different network needs.
> > Pick the one which matches your visitor behaviour. Nobody else can
> > identify the best one for you with any accuracy.

On 23.09.09 11:28, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> I did change my memory_replacement_policy, and mean_object_size because server
> is in production, a -k reconfigure is enoght or I must stop and start squid

sorry, mean_object_size? I think it's not a configuration variable but an
average object size. Didn't you mean maximum_object_size ?

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Enter any 12-digit prime number to continue.
Received on Sat Oct 03 2009 - 14:51:03 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT