try
update_headers off
and see if there's a difference.
On 28/04/2009, at 1:56 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I just recently upgraded (or in the midst of testing) and I note that
>> 3 servers that I upgraded from 2.6 stable 13 to 2.7 stable 6, are
>> running 3-4x load of the identical servers running the 2.6 stable
>> variety.
>>
>> I was wondering what would cause this?
>>
>> Should I stick with 2.6 stable 13 and be happy? I was looking forward
>> to some of the additional http 1.1 (unsupported support) :)
>>
>> Very werid, ideas?
>
> Might be the attempted fix for bug #7.
> It causes modified objects to be deleted and re-stored with every 3xx
> message updating them. 2.6 only updated the memory copy, 2.7 alters
> the
> disk copy.
>
> Amos
>
>
-- Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.comReceived on Tue Apr 28 2009 - 03:08:06 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 28 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT