Thanks Amos,
As per the benchmark result 2.7 perform better than 3.1. But Tproxy v2
patch for 2.7 is obsolete. So that i need Tproxy v4 patch for squid
2.7. If anybody have have ?..
--Vivek
-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
To: Vivek <viveksnv_at_aol.in>
Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Sent: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 2:23 pm
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid-tproxy patch for squid 3.0
Vivek wrote:
> Thanks Amos, We want Tproxy v4 support ( 2.6.28 kernel support) for
> squid 2.7. If we could get squid-3.0-tproxy patch from any achieves
it
> would be very helpful for us to develop a patch for 2.7..
>
There no single patch just a large collection of incremental changes.
The 2.7 code base is also a lot different to the 3.x codebase in these
areas.
Whats missing from 3.1 that you need from 2.7? It would be a more
future-proof work if the port was along the developer roadmap.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.6 ________________________________________________________________________ You are invited to Get a Free AOL Email ID. - http://webmail.aol.inReceived on Tue Apr 07 2009 - 11:14:40 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 07 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT