Re: [squid-users] Problems forcing mandatory proxy use.

Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> Squid itself won't. But the box underneath it will have firewall and
> routing control you can use (assuming its a non-windows box).
>
> Amos

Hi Amos

I can see this is true where the squid box is also the internet router -
but is it also true if the squid box is not the internet router - and is
not dual homed? Currently the squid box has only one network connection
- and the router function is handled by the netgear box. How much do I
need to change to eliminate NAT altogether - and go to a mandatory proxy
solution?

If it can be done without making the squid box dual homed - presumably I
need to tell the clients (via dhcp) the squid box is the default router
for the network - so they direct all proxy and non proxy traffic through
it. Presumably it would need some fancy routing to then forward internet
traffic correctly.

If the linux box cant do the job without a second network interface -
the other option would be to get a more functional internet router box.
I am gradually forming the view that it is easier to maintain networks
with lots of purpose built single function boxes - than single
multifunction boxes which do everything - but then break everything when
they need upgrades or otherwise fail... Of course this is only my
opinion...:-)

Many thanks for your advice.

Richard.

>
>>
>> Thanks again
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>>
>> matthew jones wrote:
>>> is there any need to use NAT. you could simply forward all data to
>>> the squid by setting it's IP address as the DMZ server in the WAN
>>> setup page. which would send all incomming DSL data to the IP address.
>>>
>>> if it's a tight network your after you should think about have the
>>> squid dual homed, one connecting to the router/firewall and the
>>> other to your network, thus forcing all data to pass through the
>>> proxy. also the proxy may be proxying data on more ports than 80
>>> such as https on port 4** ect.
>>>
>>> i have a GD834g too but havent tried the above as i use NAT and not
>>> a proxy at home.
>>>
>>> matt.
>>>
>>> Richard Chapman wrote:
>>>> I have squid operating well on a small NAT network. Currently - all
>>>> clients select "automatic proxy detection" and that is all working
>>>> correctly with proxy.pac script on the http server.
>>>> I wanted to ensure that the proxy is handling ALL http traffic ALL
>>>> of the time - so I can be confident of the statistics generated by
>>>> sarg (squid analysis and report generator).
>>>>
>>>> I thought this should e easy. I have a netgear DG834G router acting
>>>> as the internet DSL connection. I added 2 outgoing firewall rules
>>>> in the Dg834G:
>>>> 1) allow all going traffic from the squid servers local IP.
>>>> 2) Block port 80 traffic from all (other) local ip addresses.
>>>>
>>>> When I apply these 2 rules - the network experiences erratic
>>>> internet access. Some sites work some of the time - but not
>>>> everything works correctly. I have tried disabling the above rules
>>>> - then enabling just rule 1 - and even then the network behaves
>>>> erratically. Note that rule 1 is an "allow" rule. But as soon as I
>>>> disable both rules - everything returns to normal.
>>>>
>>>> This seems very weird to me. Can anyone suggest some subtlety I am
>>>> overlooking?
>>>> I have checked the netgear knowledge base and there are no glaring
>>>> bugs reported related to this behaviour. I have updated to the
>>>> latest netgear firmware. I can only assume the DG834 is not
>>>> behaving as expected. Can anyone se another explanation?
>>>>
>>>> In case it is relevant - the linux box is performing squid, dns,
>>>> dhcp, http and lots of other stuff but the dg834 is performing NAT
>>>> (and only NAT).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Richard.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thu Jan 15 2009 - 03:12:54 MST