Re: [squid-users] OWA accelerator authentication weirdness

Alan Lehman wrote:
>
>> The order in which our auth_param lines are configured can alter the
>> first authentication method tried. You will need to look at the
>> debugging trace in cache.log to see which is generating which question
>>
>> Amos
>
> Only basic is enabled:
> auth_param basic children 5
> auth_param basic realm Squid proxy-caching web server
> auth_param basic credentialsttl 2 hours
>
> Do I need to select a program for basic?
>
> found in cache.log:
> 2009/01/08 14:38:19.713| CacheManager::registerAction: registering legacy basicauthenticator
> 2009/01/08 14:38:19.713| CacheManager::findAction: looking for action basicauthenticator
> 2009/01/08 14:38:19.713| CacheManager::registerAction: registered basicauthenticator
> 2009/01/08 14:41:22.010| CacheManager::registerAction: registering legacy basicauthenticator
> 2009/01/08 14:41:22.010| CacheManager::registerAction: registered basicauthenticator
>
> The OWA web server has both basic and "Windows Integrated Authentication" enabled. If I disable "windows integrated", OWA works fine, but I need activesync also, which does not work without "windows integrated" enabled.
>
> Thanks,
> Alan

Ah, okay then you may have hit on a side-effect of 3.1 now having NTLM
passthru capability or unlimited request-methods.

Squid is setup according to the wiki example for OWA?

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE11
   Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.3