Mario Remy Almeida wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What I mean to say is..
>
> E.G:-
>
> SP 1 = 10.200.2.1
> SP 2 = 10.200.2.2
>
> LAN USERS = 10.200.2.x
>
> All lan users should connect to SP1 or SP2 depending upon the load and
> if one of the SP is down the other should take the load.
>
> One way of achieving load balance is with DNS
>
> proxy1.example.com IN A 10.200.2.1
> proxy1.example.com IN A 10.200.2.2
>
Hi Remy,
I agree the DNS server could do the balancing here. But to be more
precise DNS is more appropriate in Load-Balancing the other kind of
services like SMTP, WEB etc.
What I recommend is a router capable of web-traffic redirection like
WCCP in Cisco routers.
May be if you want to know more about WCCP. This URL
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-6175637.html could
let you know how it works.
Regards,
Pritam
Regards,
Pritam
> And what if the DNS Server is down and also how to do fail over
>
> //Remy
>
> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 09:05 -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>
>> Just remember
>> when using load balancing, if you use digest auth, then you MUST use
>> source persistence.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 08:38:27 Ken Peng wrote:
>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> any links on how to configure load balancing of squid
>>>>
>>> See the default squid.conf, :)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1857 - Release Date: 12/19/2008 10:09 AM
>
>
Received on Wed Dec 31 2008 - 22:15:36 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:00:02 MST