Re: [squid-users] Objects Release from Cache Earlier Than Expected

On mån, 2008-10-20 at 16:02 -0700, BUI18 wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I have been trying to track down an issue with Squid 2.6 STABLE18 and
> why users were getting TCP_REFRESH_MISS instead of TCP_REFRESH_HIT on
> files that were recently cached. We first noticed that users were
> getting misses when we expected them to receive hits.

TCP_REFRESH_MISS is a cache validation which indicated the object has
been updated on the origin server.

> I have set the min and max age to be 5 and 7 days respectively. When
> I look in the store.log file, I do see objects which were known to
> have been cached today (base on time/date stamp in the file name), yet
> they have status code of RELEASE.

And you are sure it wasn't simply replaced with a newer copy of the same
URL?

Regards
Henrik