Re: [squid-users] Warning message but Squid running

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 16:02:49 +1200 (NZST)

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
> To: "Wong" <wongbali_at_telkom.net>
> Cc: "Squid-users" <squid-users_at_squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:46
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Warning message but Squid running
>
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I just tried to use Squid 3 S6. This is my first installation as I used
>> Squid 2 so far.
>>
>> I found warning message :
>>
>> 2008/05/21 10:07:08| WARNING: '0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0' is a subnetwork of
>> '0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0'
>> 2008/05/21 10:07:08| WARNING: because of this '0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0' is
>> ignored
>> to keep splay tree searching predictable
>> 2008/05/21 10:07:08| WARNING: You should probably remove
>> '0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0'
>> from the ACL named 'all'
>>
>> Here is the squid.conf :
>>
> <snip>
>>
>> Squid is running as normal as older version. But I need advise, is it
>> normal? What parameter did I miss?
>
> It's normal and only a minor problem. The 'all' ACL is fully built-in to
> 3.x and you can safely remove it from your config.
>
> Amos
>
> ==========================
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Seems Squid 3 becomes more efficient (and simpler ?) than the older
> version.

3.x is becoming simpler and more robust than 2.x yes. Efficiency is still
a problem vs 2.6+, but is being worked out.

Amos
Received on Wed May 21 2008 - 04:02:53 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 01:05:13 MDT