On fre, 2008-05-16 at 09:18 -0700, g wrote:
> I have squid 2.6.20 running on centos, reverse-proxying for dynamic
> content...but items are not getting cached. I've run a similar
> http-accel setup with 2.5 at least a year back and didnt have this
> problem...has something changed since then?
Many things have changed, but nothing which makes Squid cache less..
> I've checked the headers from the origin servers, and all the reply
> text/xml is pretty standard and cacheable. Only tweaked header is the
> expire time, which is set by the origin to be 5 minutes.
If you post the headers or a test URL we can check for you.
> Can anyone tell me why nothing seems to be getting cached? Is there
> an inherent rejection of dynamic content now? I hope not, some of us
> rely on caching systems to smooth out the spikes in demand on our web
> services :)
>
HTTP does not have a concept of "dynamic content". Only "explicit expiry
time" or "heuristically determined freshnes", and "private/public
content". All set by HTTP headers Cache-Control and/or Expires.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Sat May 17 2008 - 07:29:16 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 01:05:13 MDT