Re: [squid-users] wccp2_weight troubles

Dave,
Thanks for response. It would be very helpful to see tcpdump of the following:

1. member caches multicast/unicast HereIam
2. Router's ISeeYou shows 2way connectivity with the caches
3. lead cache multicasts/unicasts RedirectAssign
4. Router's ISeeYou showing the bucket-assignments made

Also the output of "sh ip wccp XX detail" from your router(cisco
enterprise router)?
Thanks in advance for your help and sorry for the trouble.

On 6/1/07, Dave <dcas@tpg.com.au> wrote:
> hey thanks for your help. Do you still want to see the TCPDUMP so you
> can examine it to see if it helps with your issue of the bucket
> assignment being reserved ?
>
> Dave
>
>
> varadha tech wrote:
> > Dave,
> > Thanks for the attachment and response. The I_SEE_YOU after the
> > REDIRECT_ASSIGN is crucial as that would confirm if the router has
> > indeed complied with the request by the lead cache in REDIRECT_ASSIGN.
> > So if you get a chance to look at that, let me know or send me a
> > longer trace of the WCCP packet capture - mainly to understand what's
> > in the WCCP packets that is tickling the router to evenly load balance
> > rather than load distribute according to the weights specified.
> > Secondly did you see the data traffic being redirected across the two
> > caches and what was the wccp status output ("sh ip wccp XX detail" )
> > at the router? Thanks again.
> >
> > On 5/30/07, Dave <dcas@tpg.com.au> wrote:
> >> It is on a cisco 12.4(4t3 advanced enterprise)
> >>
> >> I have emailed you a packet trace.
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> varadha tech wrote:
> >> > Dave,
> >> > Is it possible for you to send a packet trace of the problem you see?
> >> > What is the router/IOS version that is used? I see a different problem
> >> > wherein the bucket assignment order is reversed at the router. Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > On 5/29/07, Dave <dcas@tpg.com.au> wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I have just upgraded to running WCCPv2 on squid 2.6 stable12.
> >> Everything
> >> >> is working apart from load being able to assign the weight of each
> >> proxy
> >> >> to the routers.
> >> >>
> >> >> In the squid.conf I have the following
> >> >>
> >> >> wccp2_forwarding_method 1
> >> >> wccp2_return_method 1
> >> >> wccp2_service standard 0
> >> >> wccp2_assignment_method 1
> >> >>
> >> >> On one server - wccp2_weight 200
> >> >> On the other - wccp2_weight 100
> >> >>
> >> >> But inside the router it still show 50% hash assignment.
> >> >>
> >> >> If I examine HERE_I_AM and I_SEE_YOU packets I can see the correct
> >> >> weight is being sent to the server as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> Any ideas ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thank you
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Received on Fri Jun 01 2007 - 08:17:35 MDT