Re: [squid-users] Fidelity Active Trader Pro vs. Squid 2.6STABLE12

mån 2007-03-26 klockan 17:35 -0400 skrev Mike Mitchell:

> I backed out the "Upgrade HTTP/0.9 responses to our HTTP version
> (HTTP/1.0)" patch, I'm not using helpers or collapsed forwarding.
> That leaves the patches for bugs 1787 and 1875 as a likely candidate,
> but since all requests were a MISS I don't think that's the problem.
> The only thing left is the primitive support for chunked encoding,
> unless someone has a better idea.

Not very likely as the affected sites is completely broken without that
patch, and for the rest there should be no difference.

Hmm.. thinking. Could maybe be this related patch which was overlooked
in the 2.6.STABLE merge process (it was mistakenly sorted as belonging
to another set of changes not yet merged to 2.6.STABLE):

http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/HEAD/changesets/11256.patch

try applying it on top of 2.6.STABLE12 (ignore the reject on the first
chunk with $Id:, it's expected) and let me know if it makes any
difference.

Reminds me that it's about time to start sorting the Squid-2 changes in
what has been applied to 2.6.STABLE and not..

Regards
Henrik