Re: [squid-users] WCCP Module for WCCP Version 2

Martin,

Below are the report from Cisco router.

Global WCCP information:
    Router information:
        Router Identifier: my.router.ip.addr
        Protocol Version: 2.0

    Service Identifier: web-cache
        Number of Cache Engines: 1
        Number of routers: 1
        Total Packets Redirected: 0
        Redirect access-list: squid-wccp
        Total Packets Denied Redirect: 702
        Total Packets Unassigned: 0
        Group access-list: squid-cache
        Total Messages Denied to Group: 0
        Total Authentication failures: 0

WCCP Cache-Engine information:
        Web Cache ID: my.squid.ip.addr
        Protocol Version: 2.0
        State: Usable
        Initial Hash Info: 00000000000000000000000000000000
                               00000000000000000000000000000000
        Assigned Hash Info: FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
                               FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
        Hash Allotment: 256 (100.00%)
        Packets Redirected: 0
        Connect Time: 00:02:39

From information above, the Router has WCCP link to Squid box, am I right?

Thx & Rgds,

Awie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Awie" <awie@nangura.net>
To: "Martin Köbele" <martin.kobele@netsweeper.com>
Cc: "Henrik Nordstrom" <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>;
<squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 13:58
Subject: Re: [squid-users] WCCP Module for WCCP Version 2

> > Have you turned on full blown debug logging to see what is happening or
> not
> > happening?
>
> Yes, the Linux has already modprobe ip_wccp as it was running WCCPv1.
>
> I captured the traffic to Squid box by using ethereal and I saw WCCP 2.0
> "Here I am & I see you". If the WCCP connection is establish, why is it
> unable redirect?
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thx & Rgds,
>
> Awie
>
>
> > On Friday 16 March 2007 00:03:42 Awie wrote:
> > > > Thank you very much, Henrik!
> > > >
> > > > Awie, how is it going for you?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Martin
> > >
> > > Martin & Henrik,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for discussion but I become more confuse to choose
ip_wccp
> or
> > > ip_gre. From this topic I assume that ip_wccp still able to serve
> WCCPv2.
> > > Now I try ip_wccp (version 1.7) that resulting no packet be redirected
> to
> > > Squid box.
> > >
> > > As my kernel is 2.4.34 (currently, I have no plan to use 2.6.x yet), I
> need
> > > your advise the better module I should use.
> > >
> > > Thx & Rgds,
> > >
> > > Awie
> > >
> > > > On Thursday 15 March 2007 10:54, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > > > > tor 2007-03-15 klockan 09:55 -0400 skrev Martin Kobele:
> > > > > > So in 2.4.32, the GRE implementation does not support WCCP.
> > > > > > Ok, rebooted the box, ip_gre is built into the kernel, loading
> > > > > > ip_wccp and I don't set up the GRE tunnel.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why/How does that work? It doesn't need the GRE tunnel.
> > > > > > Would it use the GRE tunnel if it was there?
> > > > >
> > > > > When you load ip_wccp it probably takes over as GRE protocol
> handler,
> > > > > effectively disabling ip_gre.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Henrik
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Kobele
> > > > Software Developer
> > > > t. 519-826-5222 ext #224
> > > > f. 519-826-5228
> > > > martin.kobele@netsweeper.com
> > > > Netsweeper Corporate Head Office
> > > > 104 Dawson Road
> > > > Guelph, Ontario
> > > > N1H 1A7
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kobele
> > Developer
> > t. 519-826-5222 ext #224
> > f. 519-826-5228
> > martin.kobele@netsweeper.com
> > Netsweeper Corporate Head Office
> > 104 Dawson Road
> > Guelph, Ontario
> > N1H 1A7
> >
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 16 2007 - 03:15:02 MDT