RE: [squid-users] CPU saturation?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: H [mailto:h@matik.com.br]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:48 AM
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] CPU saturation?
>
> On Monday 21 November 2005 07:43, James Vanns wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 20:27 -0200, H wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16 November 2005 22:07, Chris Robertson wrote:
> > > > On another note, with null caching, and multiple CPUs running more than
> > > > one instance of squid becomes a fair bit easier. See
> > > > http://squidwiki.kinkie.it/squidwiki/MultipleInstances for more
> > > > details.
> > >
> > > indeed a kinkie page like the name and absolutly helpfull ...
> > >
> > > btw you read it ?
> >
> > Yes but wasn't helpful to us unfortunately as we already have a system
> > designed in much the same way.
> >
>
>
> I think this page does not show anything so my msg was ironic ...
>
> even if you use it and get it done as they say it makes not
> so much sense
> because you have different cache_dirs as if it were different servers
>
> but for me it makes sense to run multiple instances when you
> relate them to
> each other
>
> otherwise I get all objects double or trice in my cache dirs
>
>
> --
>
>
> H.
>

Heh. I did not check the link recently. The page looks to have moved to http://squidwiki.kinkie.it/MultipleInstances.

If you set the instances to peer with each other, and specify "proxy-only" they will not duplicate content. Considering the original poster specified they were using null caching, this wouldn't be a concern.

Chris
Received on Mon Nov 21 2005 - 16:30:39 MST