RE: [squid-users] 302 response becomes not cacheable with "if-modified-since" header?

From: Chris Fong <Chris.Fong@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:03:32 -0700

Hi Henrik,

Thanks for the answer. Is it true that once 302 becomes
cacheable, the 304 response (if-modified-since >= last-modified)
will become cacheable as well?

Thanks,

--Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:53 AM
> To: Chris Fong
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] 302 response becomes not cacheable with
> "if-modified-since" header?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Chris Fong wrote:
>
> > I am currently using squid 2.5.STABLE9. I noticed that if
> my request
> > has the "if-modified-since" header, server's 302 response
> becomes no
> > longer cacheable.
>
> There is a lot odd things going on with cacheable 302
> replies, not only
> this. 302 is somewhat different from the other response codes
> wrt caching
> (use of heuristics/refresh_pattern is forbidden by spec).
>
> I am working on fixing some of this for 2.5.STABLE12. For
> details on the
> progress monitor Bug #1420.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
Received on Tue Oct 11 2005 - 11:03:36 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 12:00:04 MST