Re: [squid-users] tune up

with the below configuration of my fstab using a reiserfs FS do you think it
is ok
/dev/sdc1 /cache1 reiserfs notail,noatime
0 0

or I just stay with the default fstab which is:
/dev/sdc1 /cache1 reiserfs defaults 1 2

Thanks again,

wennie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uhlar@fantomas.sk>
To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] tune up

> On 30.05 07:49, Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
>> Another question, regarding file system, Im using reisersfs for my cache
>> partition and I've read that ext3 is faster than reiserfs,
>
> well, some people did tests that showed ext2 is faster. that does not
> necessarily mean it is really faster :)
>
>> If it so, is there a way or an option to make reiserfs as fast as ext3?
>> what are the parameters to be used for fstab to make reiserfs fast?
>
> generic option noaccess to disable updating access times, and reiserfs
> option notail and probably noborder.
>
>> In your experience which is the best file system for squid?
>
> I use FreeBSD, therefore I'm kinda limited to its ufs (with softupdates)
> ;)
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> Chernobyl was an Windows 95 beta test site.
Received on Mon May 30 2005 - 01:30:41 MDT