What kind of options are used to make ext3 comparable to ext2 in
performance for squid.
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:15 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 May 2005, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> > >However, some researches documented that reiserfs is not good FS for things
> > >like squid cache and that ext3 is faster...
>
> On 27.05 07:51, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > And several has the exact opposite results..
>
> Of course, for example there are people that do not know the 'notail' option
> for reisersfs ;)
>
> I just want to say that some people prefer ext3 over reiserfs. basically,
> used options were well-tuned for squid cache directory.
Received on Sun May 29 2005 - 06:16:15 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 12:00:03 MDT