Re: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:49:40 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Askar wrote:

> I am wondering if anyone here running "Virtual Server via IP Tunneling" or
> "Virtual Server via Direct Routing", LVS based caches cluster.

Not currently, but I have used LVS/DR and LVS/NAT in the past a lot to
load balance servers, including Squid proxy servers. Never had any reason
to use LVS/TUN as you only need this if there is a router inbetween LVS
and the host, and LVS/NAT is not desireable.

Why you ask?

Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Feb 08 2005 - 12:49:42 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 12:00:01 MST