Michael wrote:
> I have an extra 120GB drive I'm not using for anything. Would there be
> any downside to devoting the entire drive to a Squid cache?
First of all, you should only use about 80% of the drives capacity for cache
if the drive is purely for caching - the reasons are in the FAQ.
Second, a drive of this size would require a massive amount of memory to
hold cache metadata - approximately 10 MB per GB of cache. That's just the
metadata - that does not include other memory used by Squid, the OS, and
any other applications.
> Can Squid even use that big of a cache?
Yes, though you should increase the L1 and L2 settings accordingly - the
defaults are good for about 6.5 GB of cache.
Adam
Received on Sun May 30 2004 - 18:25:17 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Jun 01 2004 - 12:00:02 MDT