Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 martin.mueller@stadt.wolfsburg.de wrote:
>
>
>
>>we got two webservers an differnet ports and of course different ip's.
>>i wannted to put a reverse-proxyx in front of them to cache some requests
>>but i think this is nor what i mentionted in the postings so far?
>>
>>
>
>As the servers is on different ports the setup with Squid-2.5 is a little
>tricky, but only a little.
>
>There is two possible approaches
>
>a) Use two http_port directives, one per port, and use the virtual port
>accelerator mode.
>
Henrik,
Would you elaborate on point (a)?
I have a case here where I would like to do something similar.
1 Squid firewall machine. Internet: 24.115.66.100 Intranet:
192.168.20.10
2 Internal Web Servers.
E-Mail server: 192.168.20.8:80
Calendar server: 192.168.20.9:81
I can if need be re-align the Calendar server to port 80, but...
So far I have tried the virtual
httpd_accel_host virtual
httpd_accel_port 80
httpd_accel_single_host off
httpd_accel_with_proxy on
httpd_accel_uses_host_header on
For now though, I resulted to allow access to one host and have used our
old Netscape Proxy 3.6sp3 for the other server.
My current Squid config is:
httpd_accel_host email.komatsu.ca
httpd_accel_port 80
httpd_accel_single_host on
httpd_accel_with_proxy on
httpd_accel_uses_host_header on
I found the documents opaque on the transparent proxy issue where more
than one internal host is concerned.
If I can solve this issue I can dump the Netscape proxy. :^)
Thanks
Tim.
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Timothy E. Neto Computer Systems Engineer Komatsu Canada Limited Ph#: 905-625-6292 x265 1725B Sismet Road Fax: 905-625-6348 Mississauga, Ontario, Canada E-Mail: tneto@komatsu.ca L4W 1P9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >b) Use a redirector helper to rewrite the port number accordingly. > > >Or you could look into using Squid-3 where this type of configurations is >a lot simpler. But be warned that Squid-3.0 is still under development and >is not yet released in a STABLE version suitable for production use. > > >But if you can make sure the servers run on standard ports your life will >be a bit simpler, and also the risk for problems is much less. > >Regards >Henrik > > >Received on Thu Feb 26 2004 - 14:10:07 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 12:00:03 MST