Re: [squid-users] Problem with load balanced site

Thanks for your response all.

In regards to the form of load balancing, this is what I got froma
dig....

;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.national.com.au. 469 IN CNAME www.bal.national.com.au.
www.bal.national.com.au. 10 IN A 203.57.241.101
www.bal.national.com.au. 10 IN A 203.57.240.101

Maybe it is round robined.....I spose the CNAME would do the same thing.

I can't get anything useful out of the helpdesk though.

Does this help?

On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:46, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thursday 14 August 2003 00.15, Mick Reichelt wrote:
> > Hi There,
> >
> > I am running squid 2.4STABLE1 and was wondering if anyone has
> > experienced any problems with squid accessing load balanced sites.
> > I am having this problem, where a particular site (national.com.au)
> > which squid just doesn't want to have a bar of. I have tried the
> > no_cache option and still no joy. Any help would be appreciated.
>
>
> Maybe this site is using the same broken firewall as another user
> reported problems with a while ago. Apparently this was a Cisco PIX
> configured to do HTTP filtering.. see
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/#squid-2.5.STABLE3-hostheader
> for a possible workaround.
>
> The workaround does not address the problem to 100% as the problem is
> the broken firewall, but will at least make proxied requests not work
> much worse than non-proxied requests with these broken firewalls
> which should make it more obvious who to blaim when there is
> problems..
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
> --
> Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
> https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org
>
> If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or
> firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
> http://www.marasystems.com/, info@marasystems.com
>
Received on Mon Aug 18 2003 - 18:11:41 MDT