Re: [squid-users] Separate machines for cache and bandwodth management?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:15:39 +0200

On Tuesday 12 August 2003 13.15, ads squid wrote:

> Is it necessary to have separate machines for cache
> server and separate for bandwidth management(may be
> acl/delay pools handling, ect.) OR single machine
> squid installed acting as cache server and handling
> CAL's and delay pools is O.K.?

Most use a single Squid for the purpose.

> How many concurrent users this machine can handle? Is
> it O K. for 60 concurrent users (that is 20 % of 300
> total users)?

How man users depends on the type of users and their frequency of
internet use, but a properly configured Squid can handle a couple of
thousand concurrent users (tenths of thousands of office users) with
a machine not too different from yours (just a couple of more
harddrives and maybe a little more memory), so I would say you are
very fine for the number of users you have, probably way overkill
even.

-- 
Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org
If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or
firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
http://www.marasystems.com/, info@marasystems.com
Received on Tue Aug 12 2003 - 16:16:44 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:18:50 MST