RE: [squid-users] Issues with Windows Update (transparent proxy + squid guard + seperate squid box)

From: Nick Pappas <nickpappas@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:12:26 -0400

For the record, in case there are other who may be / will be in the same
case as us; this solved the problem completely. No more issues with Windows
Update, and a host of other ssl-based sites now function properly.

Thank you for your assistance.

Nick Pappas
The Keyes Company

-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 5:57 PM
To: Nick Pappas; Squid-Users@Squid-Cache. Org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Issues with Windows Update (transparent proxy +
squid guard + seperate squid box)

On Tuesday 08 July 2003 23.03, Nick Pappas wrote:

> So the goal at the moment is to find a way to transparently make https
> traffic go in and out of the squid box (from the NAT box).

See advanced routing.

Hint: You don't nat either of http or https on the "NAT" gateway, just
route them.

-- 
Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org
If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or firewall
appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
http://www.marasystems.com/, info@marasystems.com
Received on Thu Jul 10 2003 - 19:12:35 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:55 MST