Re: [squid-users] Load balancing on single machine

In my sense if one proxy will down another will not take it's place because
iptable rules are redirecting packets to both port and port instance is not
running.. so what type of load balancing .........:)
Better to run Linux clustering that is much better then things like that...

-- 
Best Regs,
Masood Ahmad Shah
System Administrator
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|   Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan
|   Tel: +92-42-6677024
|   Mobile: +92-300-4277367
|   http://www.fibre.net.pk
|   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
"All I want is a few minutes alone with the source code for the universe and
a quick recompile."
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kinkie" <kinkie-squid@kinkie.it>
To: "Masood Ahmad Shah" <masood@ipsec.fibre.net.pk>
Cc: "Marc Elsen" <marc.elsen@imec.be>; "Dusan Djordjevic"
<dusan@planetsky.com>; <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Load balancing on single machine
| "Masood Ahmad Shah" <masood@ipsec.fibre.net.pk> writes:
|
| > hmmm but what do u think if the proxy is transparent ..........:)
|
| [...]
|
| The trick is the same. Just do two rules, one with source
|
| -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.1
|
| redirecting to the first instance of the transparent proxy, the other with
|
| \! -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.1
|
| redirecting to the other instance.
|
| -- 
| kinkie (kinkie-squid [at] kinkie [dot] it)
| Random fortune, unrelated to the message:
| Yow!  Am I in Milwaukee?
|