hmmm but what do u think if the proxy is transparent ..........:)
-- Best Regs, Masood Ahmad Shah System Administrator ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan | Tel: +92-42-6677024 | Mobile: +92-300-4277367 | http://www.fibre.net.pk | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) "All I want is a few minutes alone with the source code for the universe and a quick recompile." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kinkie" <kinkie-squid@kinkie.it> To: "Marc Elsen" <marc.elsen@imec.be> Cc: "Dusan Djordjevic" <dusan@planetsky.com>; <squid-users@squid-cache.org> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 1:54 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] Load balancing on single machine | Marc Elsen <marc.elsen@imec.be> writes: | | > Dusan Djordjevic wrote: | >> | >> Monday 07 July 2003 10:56, Marc Elsen: | >> > > I plan to install few instances of Squid on one multiprocessor box | >> > > and balance load between them. I plan to use LinuxVirtualServer | >> > > for it. Do someone have that kind of solution ? What load | >> > > balancing you suggest ? Any other recommendation ? | >> > Do you have an idea of the sustained http reqs/sec , your squid | >> > has to deal with ? | >> | >> Yes. I need specific non-caching proxy. There are 3000-5000 requests per | >> second. Currently I have one 4CPU box i would like to deploy. | > | > Hm, I think I read that squid can give you a max. of about 300 | > reqs/sec. | > As stated before on the list squid on itself can not make | > use of more then one cpu. | > | > So I think in a virtual server setup, you may be better off with 4 | > separate boxes (probably), I think it would give you more | > flexibility and squid service uptime, if one box is down, | > for instance. | | If you're running on Linux, there is a trick which can balance | between 2 squid instances running on the same box, discriminating between | the two depending on the client IP address. | Run the second instance on some other http_port (i.e. 4128) and add this | iptables rule: | | iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.1 -p tcp \ | --destination-port 3128 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 4128 | | | More instances (in powers of 2) should be possible using similar tricks. | | | -- | kinkie (kinkie-squid [at] kinkie [dot] it) | Random fortune, unrelated to the message: | Can't act. Slightly bald. Also dances. | -- RKO executive, reacting to Fred Astaire's screen test. | Cerf/Navasky, "The Experts Speak" |Received on Mon Jul 07 2003 - 03:26:06 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:51 MST