Re: [squid-users] squid as a proxy

I'm just curious why change if you already have WinProxy purchased?

With linux and squid, you'll have to configure several "applications". If
you stick to WinProxy, you only have to deal with the one application.

Normally I'd tell people to go the Squid route, but you already own the
other software. It would make sense to keep using WinProxy.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc van Selm" <marc.van.selm@nc3a.nato.int>
To: "Kelly Watts at Ring's End (ICQ 92802550)" <rkwatts@ntplx.net>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid as a proxy

> At 08:53 AM 6/6/01 -0400, Kelly Watts at Ring's End (ICQ 92802550) wrote:
> >I am currently using Winproxy for dialup internet access for about 50
> >Windoze pc's. I am getting frame connection and a Cisco 1720 router. I
am
> >thinking of using a Linux machine and squid as a dedicated Proxy server
> >and I also need a firewall. I have unix experience. I need this to be
> >solid and secure. I am willing to spend money to buy what I need to
> >minimize the work I have to do. Any thoughts??? Thanks to all
>
> Besides the comments made by others. Configure IP access lists on your
> router's WAN interface and let your router do access control on L3/4. Look
> at in the Cisco docs for details. When you know the trick it is actually
> not to complicated and pretty powerful.
>
> Marc
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Marc van Selm
> NATO C3 Agency, CSD/A
>
> *********************************************************
> ** -- This mail is personal -- **
> ** All statements in this mail are made from my own **
> ** personal perspective and do not necessarily reflect **
> ** my employer's opinions or policies. **
> *********************************************************
Received on Wed Jun 06 2001 - 08:18:59 MDT