Re: [squid-users] squid 2.4 stable 1

I don't think I am the right person to answer this.
but squid initially was developed on digital unix ...
choose the platform which u feel comfortable with, and ask to the
list see whether anyone using the same platform u are going to
choose. but dont choose winnt. i didnt hear any good comments
from this list so far.
few things u need to take care also:
the os memory management
disk i/o management

I installed squid on my freebsd 4.3, it is running quite good for
supporting over 200 clients. but it still need more tuning.

good luck.

On 31 May 2001, at 12:33, Balu wrote:

>
>
> > squid has its good reputation by looking at its history.
> > and it is widely used by enterprise network or personal network. it
> > is supported and using by a large number of increasing users. stable
> > or not, this depends on not only application itself, but also your
> > os environment, user who is going to maintain the squid, and
>
> Which OS will be advisable one? ...If so why?
>
> > how the user tuning and harden the squid.
> > this is just my personal opinion only.
> >
> > On 30 May 2001, at 22:40, TomC wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > > Is it stable enough to run as a high loading http cache servers?
> > >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Received on Sat Jun 02 2001 - 04:01:20 MDT