Bellenberg@debis.com wrote:
> My questions:
> 1. Does it make sense to use parameter "weight" of option "cache_peer" if
> only one parent is supposed to get ICP queries anyway?
No. weight currently only applies to ICP peers.
> 1. What means 'larger': Is a relation 'lame weight=1' vs. 'fast weight=5'
> enough to prefer the fast one nearly always?
5 is larger than 1, but see above.
> 3. Are there any other options to give more weight or preference to a
> certain parent?
Not really. Squids selection algorithm is currently a big mess, and
someone needs to take the time to rework it from scratch with the proper
knobs for tuning relations irregardless of selection algorithms.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hackerReceived on Tue Nov 16 1999 - 14:06:07 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 11:57:32 MDT