On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Dave J Woolley wrote:
> > shouldn't the cache_mem be set to something like 300Mb?
> >
> The FAQ, incorrectly estimates the total memory as three
> times this figure, but postings on this list indicates that
> the reality is that it is this this figure, plus various
> overheads, plus a multiple of the number
> of objects in the whole cache (including, and normally mainly,
> the disk cache).
Any guess as to what a reasonable multiplier might be then?
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell
Earth is a single point of failure.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Received on Wed Nov 10 1999 - 14:06:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 11:57:32 MDT