RE: hotmail caching

From: David J Woolley <djw@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 14:10:22 +0100

> If the no-cache directive does not specify a field-name, then a cache MUST
> NOT use the response to satisfy a subsequent request without successful

I think you should consider that almost certainly hotmail intend it
not to be cached at all (so that they can change adverts and do click
trailing) and it may well be that squid has the misunderstanding that
no-cache means don't store.

-- 
David Woolley - Office: David Woolley <djw@bts.co.uk>
BTS             Home: <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Wallington      TQ 2887 6421
England         51  21' 44" N,  00  09' 01" W (WGS 84)
Received on Thu May 13 1999 - 07:14:30 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:46:17 MST