At 02:43 24/10/98 -0500, Matt Hight wrote:
>Thanks all for the error msg thing. But I didn't take it i jusr modified
>what it said just a little bit.
>
>I was just wondering if Squid would benifit having a multi proccessor
>server?
Of coz it does! Even vi will run faster with an extra CPU! =)
>currently i have:
>p2 266, 128ram, 2 4.5gb 10k drives and a 4gb 6k, slakware 3.5, linux
>2.0.35, squid.2.1.pre1
>i have room for one more proc and was just wondering if i should go all
>the way?
When I's working at AT&T, we were testing a couple of boxes with similar
config like yours only diff HD and running Red Hat. 99% of the time, 5 min
avg loading is less than 0.30. (I plotted it with MRTG.) So my suggestion
is get more RAM instead of an extra CPU. (Can 2.0.35 handles more than
128Mb RAM? Anyone?) If u are sceptical then try plotting the CPU graph
yourself.
:Parabola
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Intelligence is merely the accumulation of experience...
..
Parabola - the famous curve.
Email: mailto:parabola@ozemail.com.au
URL: http://parabola.home.ml.org/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Received on Sat Oct 24 1998 - 14:41:48 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:42:46 MST