Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches.

From: B. Richardson <rabtter@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 18:32:34 -0400 (EDT)

I am theorizing that if a large proportion of files are 4k or less,
then 4k is a better choice for block size than 8k.

Comments?

-

Barrett Richardson rabtter@orion.aye.net
Received on Mon Jul 20 1998 - 15:32:43 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Strangenesses in 1.2beta22"
Previous message: Chuck Pitre: "linux kernels"
Next in thread: Alex Rousskov: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."
Reply: Alex Rousskov: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:41:11 MST