Re: VM Objects -> 1.NOVM.18?

From: Karl Ferguson <karl@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 09:47:32 +0800

At 08:27 PM 24/11/97 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> Wasn't NOVM, meant to be *NO* VM?
>
>Novm doesn't use VM for in-transits.. If cachmem > 0 then it still uses
>cachmem amount of mem for mem caching objects..

Strangely enough, I find cache_mem to be sort of useless to allocate memory
under NOVM. I've set cache_mem to 30 and it went past that:

nobody 2140 1.7 34.8 34864 33284 ? S 23:08 11:02 squid -sY

Actually, strangely even more enough, a report from cachemgr shows:

Accounted Memory Usage:
        StoreEntry 250426 x 52 bytes = 12716 KB
        URL strings = 12135 KB
        IPCacheEntry 153 x 36 bytes = 5 KB
        FQDNCacheEntry 0 x 56 bytes = 0 KB
        Hash link 0 x 12 bytes = 0 KB
        Pool MemObject structures 5 x 80 bytes = 0 KB ( 0
free)
        Pool for Request structur 11 x 4408 bytes = 47 KB ( 0
free)
        Pool for in-memory object 0 x 4096 bytes = 0 KB ( 0
free)
        Pool for disk I/O 71 x 8192 bytes = 568 KB ( 0
free)
        NetDB Address Entries 0 x 76 bytes = 0 KB
        NetDB Host Entries 0 x 8 bytes = 0 KB
        NetDB Peer Entries 0 x 24 bytes = 0 KB
        ClientDB Entries 23 x 292 bytes = 6 KB
        Miscellaneous = 1690 KB
        Total Accounted = 27219 KB

Even though squid is using over 30meg physically, will it keep the "Total
Accounted" under 30 as per the configuration file?

Regards

Regards

--
          This message is Copyright (C) 1997 by Karl Ferguson
Tower Networking Pty Ltd   Tel: +61 8 9456 0000     karl@tower.net.au
t/a STAR Online Services   Fax: +61 8 9455 2776     ICQ UIN: 2287428 
Received on Mon Nov 24 1997 - 17:57:44 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:37:43 MST