Hi,
Does anyone have real life experience with both RAID sets and multiple
drives configurations for cache_dirs? I'm going to setup our cache on
a RAID-able box with 6x 4GB drives and I'm wondering what is "better",
either use a single huge logical drive and let RAID distribute load or
use multiple logical drives and let squid/os distribute load.
I'm considering these scenarios:
1) OS on separate disk, no FT, cache on 5 separate disks, no FT,
use RAID controller only as accelerator (it has 16MB R/W cache)
2) OS on separate disk, no FT, cache on 5 disks in RAID0 (stripeset)
3) OS on logical drive, cache on 1 logical drive, both distributed on
6 disks in RAID-5.
4) OS on logical drive, cache on x logical drives, all on 6-drive RAID-5
Box is dedicated for caching, no other service is run there. As such,
Fault Tolerance (FT) is not the highest priority, but then again, having
hot-swap drives and hardware wide-ultra RAID accelerator, I don't want
to feel real stupid in case a single drive fails in 1,2. Can't decide
if to go 3 or 4 although I have a feeling that RAID would distribute
load better than OS/squid.
any hints/gotchas/suggestions?
please CC me - i'm not on the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andres Kroonmaa mail: andre@online.ee
Network Manager
Organization: MicroLink Online Tel: 6308 909
Tallinn, Sakala 19 Pho: +372 6308 909
Estonia, EE0001 http://www.online.ee Fax: +372 6308 901
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Nov 17 1997 - 06:31:50 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:37:39 MST