Re: Default behavior for --enable-esi?

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:38:54 +1300

On 27/12/2012 2:07 a.m., Kinkie wrote:
> Hi all,
> What is in your opinion the right behavior wrt ESI in configure,
> default-maybe (enabled if all dependencies are present) or
> default-disable? The latter is what is curerntly in, but I'm concerned
> it may be due to a bug in configure.ac.
>
> Thanks
> --
> /kinkie

IIRC it is still off because it is not wanted by many installations and
adds a large footprint to the binary. The more useful
surrogate-capabilities sub-component is auto-enabled on reverse-proxy
traffic regardless of ESI.

Amos
Received on Thu Dec 27 2012 - 00:38:59 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 27 2012 - 12:00:24 MST