> On sön, 2008-10-19 at 14:09 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
>> I know this is an old thread, but if somebody is going to work on this,
>> please add some logic/options that would allow the peer to stay "up"
>> after N sequential failures. The current Squid2 monitoring code is not
>> usable in busy environments with occasional isolated failures between
>> essential peers.
>
> Yes, there need to be a dampening function.
>
> I don't know why we (me @ MARA) didn't implement that when the feature
> was first implemented in Squid rproxy patch. We already had such
> implementations in many other similar tests outside Squid for well known
> reasons..
>
> Thanks for the reminder. Now were do we place this so it's not forgotten
> again? A feature page?
Done.
Bugzilla http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2185
Amos
Received on Mon Oct 20 2008 - 02:36:47 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 23 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT